So, apparently, there is a decision-making process in place. I’m not sure how it might be improved, since this is quite literally the first I have heard about it.
Since you seem to be one of the folks in charge of the decisions on the wiki, perhaps *you* might consider how to improve the process, so that you encourage engagement, rather than discourage it. David > On Apr 27, 2017, at 7:49 PM, Frank H. Ellenberger > <frank.h.ellenber...@gmail.com> wrote: > > David, > > let me try to describe the current state: > > some of us watch almost daily > http://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Special:RecentChanges > to prevent spam and avoid misleading information. > > (That is the place, where your commits didn't appear in the first > quarter year of your activity, so you were almost invisible like a ninja.) > > If we are unshure, how to handle a special case, we collect opinions on > irc://irc.gimp.org/gnucash > usually at european evening/american afternoon time. > > If a problem is more comlex, we open a bugilla entry to collect the > different aspects. > > If we think we need a broader base to find a decision we open a thread > at gnucash-devel if mostly contributors are affected or gnucash-user else. > > If I reedit a commit of a serious user, not a spammer, and the reason is > not obvious by my commit, I add a note on the users talk page. > > Perhaps I should add the hint "Feel free to open a discussion on the > respective mailing list." > > How, do you think, can we improve this? > > Frank > _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
