On Sep 5, 2014, at 10:02 AM, Mike Alexander <m...@umich.edu> wrote: > On Sep 5, 2014, at 11:26 AM, Buddha Buck <blaisepas...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> When every method name has to be Hungarian-notated to work with >> pseudonamespaces, short namespace abbreviations make sense. >> >> But with true namespaces, using directives, and namespace aliasing >> available in C++, I see benefits in readability to use full length names >> for namespaces (like GnuCash::Account instead of gncAccount or >> Gnc::Account. There's less likelyhood of collision with, say, a library >> written to support the General Nutrition Centers (GNC) chain of stores. >> >> While I personally prefer snake_case to camelCase, I think that the >> idiomatic C++ tends to use camelCase. > > I agree with both points. I think the namespace name should be spelled out > in full and camel case is more often used in C++. I happen to prefer it, but > perhaps that’s just because I’ve used it more. >
Yes, using GnuCash is less ambiguous that Gnc. Sold. For the record I don’t care about snake vs. camel as long as we pick one. Regards, John Ralls _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
