Isn't this what the PRIxxx macros in inttypes.h are for?
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Derek Atkins <warl...@mit.edu> wrote: > Geert Janssens <janssens-ge...@telenet.be> writes: > > >> Note that %ld v %lld varies on Linux too. To print/scan a gint64 you > >> need %lld on 32-bit linux but %ld on 64-bit linux (because long long > >> is 64/128 bits respectively!) This is why we try to use > >> G_INT64_FORMAT everywhere, because it will generally "do the right > >> thing". > >> > > Ok, thanks. > > > > What will happen when we move away from glib eventually ? Isn't > > G_INT64_FORMAT a glib defined macro ? > > Yes, it is a glib-defined macro, but we can effectively replace it with > our own equivalent. Basically we need to figure out the sizeof(long) > and sizeof(long long), and based on that and the platform we can make an > assignment of the macro. > > -derek > -- > Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory > Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB) > URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH > warl...@mit.edu PGP key available > _______________________________________________ > gnucash-devel mailing list > gnucash-devel@gnucash.org > https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel > _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
