Hi Frank,

thanks for your comments. As I am not an accountant and also not familiar with business taxation there are a couple of questions to your comments - maybe even very basic ones.

First the most general question:
I am not sure if I should read a message like "this is not a good idea" from your comments, because it is colliding with other already ongoing work. My general goal is to have a common framework for taxation that can be used for all (ok, let's say "most") tax countries and tax types. The setup shall be adjustable per country. My hope is that the work already done for Germany can be combined/merged with this. I volunteer to do the merging but I probably need some help for that (once I have reached that point).

My question: Do you agree or disagree that my approach can also be used for your purposes?

Other questions and comments I have inserted below.

Gruss,
Carsten


On 10/27/2013 01:49 AM, GnuCash (bugzilla.gnome.org) wrote:

--- Comment #4 from Frank H. Ellenberger <frank.h.ellenber...@gmail.com> 
2013-10-26 23:49:34 UTC ---
Created an attachment (id=258194)
  --> (https://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=258194)
Approach to get a german income tax declaration

Hi Carsten,

a few notes:

Comment #1:
  1. should become part of file property, to get it persistent. Then a user with
i.e. a business in DE and the home seat in BE could manage the sales tax (and
business income tax)in her DE file and the personal income tax in a BE file.
Hm, not sure. Currently the concept as shown in the attached prototype should allow for tax IDs for different countries in the same book. Might be useful, if you have international business, so I vote for not fixing it to the file properties. The final scheme report has to check, if the report covers more than one country, and act accordingly.

  2. No:
   a) it is not in Preferences, but in Edit and it edits the tax properties of
the accounts in your current file.
Correct. Thanks for the hint and sorry for being unprecise here.
   b) It is also used for sales taxes like in SKR04, so INCOME tax would be
misleading.
This a comment that I do not understand.
I see sales tax as on of the tax types, so the can be covered with the given concept, so I do not really see what it is that is misleading here. SKR04 seems to be a way of giving an identifier to certain business accounts. I tried to look it up in Wikipedia but that did not really take me far but I get the impression that this is specific for Germany and a few other countries.
Can you explain some more?

  3. TXF is form oriented, but
  a) The report is not.
As far as I found out TXF is a data format to transfer data between certain programs. It appears to me to be very specific and not related to the paper forms if you "read" TXF data. If it is form related, than the forms are needed for the given concept, TXF itself is not relevant for it (first step is only about data collection in a report, data transfer can be second stope afterwards). By the way: The TXF related article in Wikipedia has been deleted ("Article has no meaningful, substantive content").
  b) the german UStVA was originally a proof on concept which became useful for
german business users, but the de files need some rework to get it together
with the income tax declaration ESt.
  In 2008 I started an approach with the ESt2004 forms, but I got disrupted.
Probably we can take the attachement as a starting point for a german ESt
template.

Eventually you should search the german mailing list for some discussions a few
years ago leading to the german MWSt/VAT part in SKR04, electronic tax
reporting with ElStEr/libGeier...
There is also some background in http://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/De/Projekte and
http://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/De/SKR04
This part brought me to the general question at the top of this mail.


_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel

Reply via email to