On Jul 1, 2013, at 8:21 AM, "Derek Atkins" <de...@ihtfp.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, July 1, 2013 11:14 am, John Ralls wrote: >> >> On Jul 1, 2013, at 5:58 AM, Derek Atkins <warl...@mit.edu> wrote: >>> >>> So what does "git-update" do that "git fetch" (or git pull) does not? >>> Could I theoretically run a 'git fetch' into the bare repo, clone that >>> into each checkout I need, git svn init in each WC, and then dcommit >>> from there back to SVN? So I'd run 'git-update' from the WCs (instead >>> of 'git pull'), but still run 'git fetch' from the bare repo? It does >>> mean that I'm holding around multiple copies of the git repo, but I >>> could use --local to try to conserve space. >> >> It fixes up the local branch head references, which git svn needs to stay >> in sync. > > So it's only needed in a repo that has been initialized with git svn > --init, right? I.e., it's only necessary in the (a?) repo that is going > to dcommit back to svn? Yes, that's correct. Regards, John Ralls _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
