On Apr 28, 2013, at 1:14 AM, Graham Leggett <minf...@sharp.fm> wrote:
> On 28 Apr 2013, at 04:45, John Ralls <jra...@ceridwen.us> wrote: > >> The rules say that you have to distribute all of the source code, but I >> think that it's become >> pretty common to rely on the fact that the sources are all readily available >> via the net. You'll >> probably want to get an OK from your lawyers. > > The rules say that if you make changes to the code, you must make those > changes to the source available under the same license. > > If you don't make changes to the code, for example you just publish the > binaries as provided, then just link back to the source here. > > The source doesn't need to be on the same physical medium, but does need to > be available. An example might be binaries on an operating system CD, with > source available via the operating system website. Wrong. http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0-faq.html#TOCUnchangedJustBinary Regards, John Ralls _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
