As for Josh Sled's original contribution: His last statement about the GPL version(s) of his contributions was on 2010-08-28, saying
> Any contribution I've made to gnucash which was under the GPLv2 only may > be considered to be under both v2 and v3. https://lists.gnucash.org/pipermail/gnucash-devel/2010-August/029370.html Following along that lines, we can consider his original .rnc file to be under GPL-v2 and -v3. I don't know any details about Baptiste Carvello's licensing intentions here. On the other hand, at the time of his contributions (August and November 2012), the whole source code of gnucash was GPL-v2 and -v3 (stated in LICENSE since r19546 in September 2010). Because of that, you can assume the contribution to the project are at least under the same license as the project itself, which means your file is GPL-v2 and -v3. Regards, Christian Am Samstag, 2. März 2013, 19:32:00 schrieb Thorsten Behrens: > Hi guys, > > was wondering about $subject, since nothing is explicitely stated in > the rng file. Would you, as the authors, be able to add a clarifying > comment? > > (background - code-generating from it in > https://github.com/tdf/pygnclib) > > Thanks a lot, > > -- Thorsten _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
