On Jan 23, 2012, at 9:48 AM, Derek Atkins wrote: > John Ralls <jra...@ceridwen.us> writes: > >> On Jan 23, 2012, at 4:28 AM, Reuben Cummings wrote: >> >>> *** Checking out icon-naming-utils *** [55/73] >>> gunzip -dc "/Users/admin/gtk/source/pkgs/icon-naming-utils-0.8.90.tar.gz" >>> | tar xf - >>> >>> gzip: /Users/admin/gtk/source/pkgs/icon-naming-utils-0.8.90.tar.gz: >>> not in gzip format >>> *** Error during phase checkout of icon-naming-utils: could not unpack >>> tarball (expected icon-naming-utils-0.8.90 dir) *** [55/73] >>> >>> ......... >>> >>> I ran less on icon-naming-utils-0.8.90.tar.gz and it is an html file. >> >> Well, just ducky. Tango has broken their website. I followed the link off of >> their download page in my browser and got the same error. >> >> So here it is (the bz2 one) from my download archive. Copy it into >> ~/gtk/source/pkgs, delete the other one, and run. > > I wonder if we should copy the dependent source tarballs onto our SF > download page so we can stabilize our dependencies and not depend on the > upstream keeping them for us?
Yes, for the short term. I suspect Tango is comatose, if not deceased. In the long term we need to get rid of libgnome, which will also get rid of the dependency on icon-naming-utils. Regards, John Ralls _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
