Op zondag 4 december 2011 19:08:10 schreef John Ralls: > Author: jralls > Date: 2011-12-04 19:08:10 -0500 (Sun, 04 Dec 2011) > New Revision: 21677 > Trac: http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/21677 > > Modified: > gnucash/trunk/src/gnc-module/test/misc-mods/Makefile.am > gnucash/trunk/src/gnc-module/test/test-agedver.c > gnucash/trunk/src/gnc-module/test/test-dynload.c > gnucash/trunk/src/gnc-module/test/test-incompatdep.c > gnucash/trunk/src/gnc-module/test/test-load-c.c > gnucash/trunk/src/gnc-module/test/test-modsysver.c > Log: > [Testing] Gnc-module: Provide checked error messages to replace noted > warnings (c-files only) > > > Much better for expected warnings to be tested for than to have a lead-in > message saying that they're really OK. > > Don't have the test utilities in Scheme yet. > > Set the phony modules in misc-modules to be libtool modules instead of > shared libraries. Aside from being more correct, this ensures that they'll > have the same name on Linux and OSX. > > _______________________________________________ > gnucash-patches mailing list > gnucash-patc...@gnucash.org > https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-patches
When I started my fixes on the tests (which you have nicely completed), I considered backporting the changes to the 2.4 branch. I did port most of my changes like that. Would it make sense to backport your test fixes and if so, before 2.4.9 is released this weekend ? Geert _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
