XHTML 1.0 and HTML 4.01 Strict are nearly identical. Personally I like some of the XHTML code styles betters (such as <br /> instead of <br></br>) so I would shoot for that, but I would start off trying to get it to validate against HTML 4.01 Transitional first.
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Derek Atkins <de...@ihtfp.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, July 29, 2011 4:22 pm, Cristian Marchi wrote: > > While working on the beta website, i just checked how it validates [1] > > and there are many errors. I'm not an expert in this field so I'm asking > > if it's worth to correct them? If yes, is it better to use a HTML 4.01 > > strict or a XHTML 1.0 strict doctype. > > I don't have an opinion here. Maybe others will. > > > Always talking about website, the Search page is not rendered correctly > > [2]. Does someone know what's going on? > > I know about the search page. I haven't had the chance to look into it. > It's been broken since the upgrade to Fedora 15. And namazu is no longer > part of Fedora. So perhaps we should just look for a new search engine? > > > Thanks for any advice. > > > > Regards > > Cristian > > > > [1] > > > http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gnucash.org%2Fbeta%2F&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline&group=0&user-agent=W3C_Validator%2F1.2 > > [2] https://lists.gnucash.org/search/ > > _______________________________________________ > > gnucash-devel mailing list > > gnucash-devel@gnucash.org > > https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel > > > > -derek > > -- > Derek Atkins 617-623-3745 > de...@ihtfp.com www.ihtfp.com > Computer and Internet Security Consultant > > _______________________________________________ > gnucash-devel mailing list > gnucash-devel@gnucash.org > https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel > _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
