John Ralls <jra...@ceridwen.us> writes:
[snip]
> Schema: OK. To make the policy clearer, backwards-incompatible schema
> changes in 2.5 require a change to 2.4 to provide a read facility for
> the new schema.
Sure. Note that this doesn't have to happen in 2.4.0. Having it in
2.4.1 or even 2.4.6 is probably fine. Although note that some long-term
Ubuntu/Debian systems are still running 2.2.6, not 2.2.9, so YMMV.
Obviously the earlier you can make changes the better.
This also works better if we have more frequent (yearly-ish?) major
releases.
> Split vs. Transaction: OK, it looks like it doesn't matter anyway,
> since the dates live in the transaction, so it has to be joined with
> the split to filter the report.
*nods*
> Regards,
> John Ralls
-derek
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH
warl...@mit.edu PGP key available
_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
