Christian Stimming <stimm...@tuhh.de> writes:
>> Should we declare "feature freeze" at this point, and perhaps make a 2.4
>> branch?
>
> A 2.4 branch should not yet be made, but rather closely around the
> actual 2.4.0 release date. Even though there is also experimental work
> going on, there is still a lot of bugfixing everywhere. If we branched
> now, we would have a heck of a lot of merging / cherry-picking back
> and forth between branches. I definitely prefer a 2.4 branch only very
> close before 2.4.0 date - something like 2-3 weeks before that date.
Seconded -- let's not branch 2.4 unless after 2.4.0 is released. If we
want we can make the 2.4.0 tag be the 'base' of the 2.4.0 branch too.
For 2.2 we didn't actually create the 2.2 branch until about 2.2.2.
> Regards,
>
> Christian
-derek
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH
warl...@mit.edu PGP key available
_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
