After a short discussion on this topic in June, it seems to me everyone is more or less satisfied with the style proposed below. If this is the case, I would volunteer to actually transform the code according to this style.
Regards, Christian http://lists.gnucash.org/pipermail/gnucash-devel/2007-March/020099.html Indentation -nut No tabs. Indentation is done with spaces. -i4 Add four spaces for each indent level -ci4 Continuation lines are indented by four spaces -cli4 Case labels are indented by four spaces -ppi4 Nested pre-processor defines are indented by four spaces -nbc Do not force newlines after commas in declarations (default) -nbfda Don´t put each argument in a function declaration on a separate line (default) -lp Line up continued lines at parentheses (default) -psl Put the type of a procedure on the line before its name. -bbo Prefer to break long lines before boolean operators. Blank Lines -nsob Do not swallow optional blank lines (default) -bad Force a blank line after a declaration. -bbb Force a blank line before a block comment. -bap Force blank lines after procedure bodies. Comments -fca Reformat all comments except those starting in column 1 -fc1 Reformat comments starting in column 1 -sc Continuation lines in a comments start with a '*' -lc80 Comment line width of 80 Statements -npcs Do not put space after the function in function calls. -nprs Do not put a space after every ´(´ and before every ´)´. -ncs Do not put a space after cast operators. -saf Put a space after each for. -sai Put a space after each if. -saw Put a space after each while. -ss On one-line for and while statments, force a blank before the semicolon. -brs Put braces on struct declaration line. -bl Put braces on line after if, etc. [changed after discussion] -bli0 Indent braces 0 spaces Other -l90 Line width of 90. [changed according to discussion last year] In one single line: indent -nut -i4 -ci4 -cli4 -ppi4 -nbc -nbfda -lp -psl -bbo -nsob -bad -bbb -bap -fca -fc1 -sc -lc80 -npcs -nprs -ncs -saf -sai -saw -ss -brs -bl -bli0 -l90 *.h *.c > On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Christian Stimming <stimm...@tuhh.de> wrote: > > Zitat von Derek Atkins <warl...@mit.edu>: > >> Charles Day <ceda...@gmail.com> writes: > >>> I strongly prefer -bl to -br. > >> > >> Me too. I prefer: > >> > >> if (....) > >> { > >> .... > >> } > >> else > >> { > >> ... > >> } > > > > Agreed by me. I already wrote the same thing in 2007 [1]: I prefer -bl > > -bli0 over the proposed options. If this is a somewhat majority opinion > > here, we should surely use those options instead. > > Cool! And if we use -bl, then definitely -bli0 or I will be hopelessly > confused! > > > However I do like: > >> do > >> { > >> ... > >> } while (...); > > > > This is already included by -ce -cdw. > > This is my preference as well. > > -Charles _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
