On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 5:25 AM, Graham Leggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nathan Buchanan wrote: > > I guess the real question is - can we wait a couple years for a 64 bit >> time_t? Probably, I think. >> > > Are there any systems in wide use that aren't yet 64 bit time_t? I was > under the impression that OSes had already changed. > > A quick look under MacOSX Leopard shows time_t is a long, and on RHEL5 it > is a long int. I'm a bit out of my league here...but I believe a long (or long int) is defined to be a minimum of 32 bits - so if you're still using a 32 bit system(?) (or processor?) you may still get a 32 bit time_t. Nathan > > > Regards, > Graham > -- > -- <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> "Even if you are on the right track, you'll get run over if you just sit there" - Will Rogers _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
