Derek Atkins wrote: >>>> to switch. >>> Do you want to do this in the gda-dev or would you like a new branch >>> to work from? Branches are cheap. >> At this point, I'll work in gda-dev. > > Okay. I was just thinking that maybe "dbi-dev" would be a more > appropriate name. But up to you.
What I'm actually doing is breaking out core "sql-based" code which uses abstract connection, statement, result and result-row objects. I'll then use this to create a gda backend, to test the concept (and code) and then a dbi backend. For the gda backend, this ends up being a split and restructure of the current code. For the dbi backend, this means reimplementing connection/statement/result/result-row in terms of dbi. You could create sql-dev if you want it to be in a more appropriately named branch. As long as I'm isolated from everyone else, I don't care. Phil _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
