On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 9:30 AM, Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoting Charles Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > If this is true then it's a bug. "make install" should most certainly > > > update the installed copy of a .scm file. > > > > > > > > What seems to happen in my environment (Windows XP) is that initially > > all > > the .scm files get copied from the source repository > > (/c/soft/gnucash/repos) > > to the build tree (/c/soft/gnucash/build). Then 'make install' (actually > > make_install.sh on XP) copies them from the build tree to the install > > tree > > (/c/soft/gnucash/inst). However, if I update a .scm file in the > > repository, > > doing 'make' will not cause the updated version to get copied to the > > build > > tree, so 'make install' still installs the old version. > > > > Of course, if I blow away the build tree and start over, everything > > operates > > as expected but that takes too long. So I usually just manually install > > my > > updated .scm files and restart GnuCash. > > > > AHHH! Yes, the "Win32 doesn't support Symlinks" problem. Arguably > on win32 we really should re-copy the scheme files on every make. > > Sorry, I keep forgetting that you actually do real gnucash development > on Windows! I keep thinking that all the devs use Linux. ;) > Let me know when Linux runs Adobe Premiere or Final Cut. ;) > -Charles > > > > -derek > > -- > Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory > Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB) > URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH > [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key available > > _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
