Hi Andreas, Andreas Köhler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am Thu, 20 Mar 2008 20:56:15 +0100:
> I am sorry for answering that late No problem. > and am going to be rather responsive the following days :-) [...] > Currently I wonder about two things I cannot decide yet, namely > whether it will make sense to create a branch to work on the port Probably. > and, if we do, to create an import-export module "aqbanking". That is something which would make sense to me as well. > From my naive point of view, this will > > * avoid a lot of #if's > * has a better chance not to break aqbanking2 > * might be easier to backport > * finally renames hbci which is not hbci only anyway Yes, this sounds reasonable to me. > but also > * copy a lot of code and > * maybe be harder to maintain afterwards But this should not be a big problem because the code for the old module will most likely not change much in the future since aqbanking 2 is not maintained any more. > I suppose this simply depends on how big the changes between aq2/gwen2 > and aq3/gwen3 programming actually are. > > Maybe Christian has an idea :-) I'm sure he has. :-) Regards, Manfred -- ________________________________________________________________________ Manfred Usselmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
