On Saturday 05 January 2008 12:05:19 am Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 23:40 -0500, Tim Wunder wrote: > > You asked why direct connect would be used. I answered with my use case. > > If that doesn't suit you, so be it. It /helps/ me keep a better eye on my > > credit card than keying in paper receipts did. > > Apparently the conversation has gotten confused. >
apparently... probly my fault. > I was asking actually what it *did*, not whether people found it useful. > I'm certain people find it useful or it wouldn't be there. > > Then I said, "it doesn't help with reconciliation" (per se), which still > seems to be true, and there was then confusion about what reconciliation > is. So I clarified that. > It clears existing transactions through transaction matching and enters (and clears) non-existent transactions. Reconciling cleared transactions is automatic. I guess it can be thought of as a pre-reconciliation reconciling. So yes, it does help with reconciliation. Any cleared transactions in the statement period are automatically marked as reconciled in the reconcile process. > And then, somehow, you seem to have thought I was trying to argue it was > useless or something like that. Not sure how that happened, but that > wasn't actually what I said. > One of those cases where what was said (written) wasn't what was heard (read). My bad. Regards, Tim
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
