On Jan 3, 2008 6:03 PM, Ian Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Charles, > > You mentioned in some other e-mails that you were working on fixing some > problems with the QIF importer. What exactly are you working on? I'm looking > at trying to improve the importer myself and would like to coordinate any > changes in an effective way. That said, I'm new to coding Gnucash haven't > really thought much about the scheme part yet and was more looking at fixing > bugs in the import druid first, but eventually turn to the import itself > with the eventual (and lofty) goal of rewriting the QIF import to use the > generic import code that the OFX and other imports are using. > > Ian >
Ian, The only things I'm looking at so far are 100% in Scheme, so anything you do with the GUI or C shouldn't clash with what I'm doing. Even if you dig into the Scheme code, you probably won't conflict with me unless you are working on qif-to-gnc.scm and more specifically on the split matching/marking bits. At the moment I'm looking at bug 114724<http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114724>, bug 506810 <http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=506810>, and another bug in the Scheme code (again with split matching/marking) that I haven't reported yet. I know absolutely nothing about the generic import code and I don't predict working on it at all in the immediate future, but who knows... I've aimed for small fixes so far. If a big change is needed then maybe it would be more productive to work on the generic importer and make it happen there. I don't really have a sense for this at present. So go for it! Charles _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
