Christian Stimming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Am Sonntag, 23. Dezember 2007 18:49 schrieb Derek Atkins:
>> Quoting Andreas Köhler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> > Hi Phil,
>> >
>> > Am Freitag, den 21.12.2007, 20:10 -0500 schrieb Phil Longstaff:
>> >> 2) Now that GDates are used, is there any reason that Timespec couldn't
>> >> be replaced by GDate everywhere?
>> >
>> > GDates only support dates, but no times. So is the question is whether
>> > we we want to support only whole days.
>>
>> Ahh, there is that.. It would mean you could never support fixing
>> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89439
>
> OTOH it would mean http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=137017 (issues
> induced by time zone change) gets fixed, eventually. It has Severity: major
> Priority: High for almost two year by now :-)
Does gdate have the concept of less-than-or-equal? With a Timespec
(or time_t) it's easy to just add 12 hours to the "day" and use that
as the comparison to make sure I get everything on the right day.
However, I dont have a strong opinion about whether we should migrate
to GDate or stay with Timespec. I don't think that timezone issues
are necessarily any better or easier to handle with GDates.
> Christian
-derek
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key available
_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
