Christian Stimming wrote: > > Quoting Chris Lyttle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >>> Log: > >>> Tagging the 2.1.0 release of GnuCash > >>> > >>> Copied: gnucash/tags/2.1.0 (from rev 15912, gnucash/trunk) > >> > >> Wouldn't it make more sense if we tagged the revision that was > >> released? I'm not sure which revision that actually was, but it seems > >> like it might have been close to 15894. > >> > > It was 15892, hmm I thought that's what I did as I didnt update my tree > > when I tagged it. Damm :-( > > I suppose the command that you used was "svn copy svn+ssh://..../trunk > ...../tags/2.1.0"? In that case this would use trunk's latest > revision, regardless of your current working copy's revision. The > command for tagging a specific revision (according to Derek, > http://lists.gnucash.org/logs/2007-04-16.html#T18:04:17 ) would be > "svn copy svn+ssh://...../[EMAIL PROTECTED] .....tags/2.1.0". Just for the > record :-)
Unlike in CVS, it is very easy to correct the tag in SVN. Just "svn rm svn+ssh://.../tags/2.1.0", followed by "svn copy svn+ssh://...../[EMAIL PROTECTED] .....tags/2.1.0" should do the trick. -- Peter _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
