On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 14:06 -0500, Daniel Espinosa wrote: > I can understand why you feel that; the reason is that I don't think > that convert QOF to GObject will be a good idea because its > implementation doesn't allow it, you'll never have a full GObject > system if you insist to use QOF.
You keep making that statement, but you haven't explained what you mean by it. Why can't we eventually migrate to a full GObject, what will be missing, and what will that mean to the project? Please either explain yourself, or stop spreading what (at this point) I can only call FUD. David _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
