On 4/9/07, Christian Stimming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Am Freitag, 6. April 2007 17:51 schrieb Nathan Buchanan: > > ok..I'll wait to hear what cstim was doing. > > In fact I *did* delete them, just as you said: I recorded the download > number > in the wiki, then deleted the file in the File Release System (FRS). > > I chose to do this because usually people are confused if there is more > than > one file of the same type under one release number, and the initial > feedback > hinted that people will *not* get the idea to take the highest version > number. That's why I simply deleted the old unused files.
Sounds logical - I'll do the same. > I am planning to built them once a week, and can upload them as often as > > once a week (this is the plan). I'm not sure how often is optimal. > > Once a week should be fine, and once we have 2.1.x releases, somehow > slower is > enough. ok > On 4/6/07, Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I don't think you can "delete" old uploads, but I dont see where > > > the older versions are, so... I dont know what cstim was doing. > > > > > > How often do you plan to build releases? > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > -derek > > > > > > "Nathan Buchanan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Hello Christian, Derek! > > > > > > > > I uploaded my first windows dev build to the unstable 2.0.99 release > on > > > > sourceforge. It was r15815. What do we normally do with the previous > > > > version? > > > > > > > (r15667) Do we delete it and recored the number of downloads on the > > > > wiki? > _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
