Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Based on the maintenance and availability status, I think libgda is the >> clear choice. Since they are at beta3 already, the unstable branch >> would be better. > > Phil, > Here are some more reasons why I'd prefer libgda over libdbi: > > 1) libgda has better integration with glib. E.g. uses GValue. I > would eventually like to see further use of GValue in GnuCash. > > 2) gnomedb has gtk+ widgets that are build on top of libgda. These > may not be immediately useful for more than things like a connection > manager or login dialog, but down-the-line I could see them being > useful as presentation widgets. > >> Note that gda also supports XML databases, so that for an interchange >> format, we *could* use it instead. > > AFAIK, this isn't true anymore. But, I believe it could be made true > again if we really wanted it to. > > -chris
It sounds like GDA is the way to go. -derek -- Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB) URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key available _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel