On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 08:09:26PM -0400, Derek Atkins wrote: > Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > >On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 06:01:20PM -0400, Derek Atkins wrote: > >>Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > >>> +# Not sure if this is new enough > >>> +AC_PROG_SWIG(1.3.25) > >> > >>FC5 only has swig-1.3.24.. So.. This is going to be problematic. > > > >I _think_ I upgraded above 1.3.24 in order to get support for > >"-external-runtime". But, we may decide to commit the runtime file > >(swig-runtime.h, as I've currently done just for convenience.) If we > >do, 1.3.24 may work fine. Also, if we distribute the swig-generated > >files then we wouldn't need the configure check for swig. > > The question remains: even when building from SVN does it require > swig 1.3.25? That sort of limits development platforms considerably. > Is committing swig-runtime.h to SVN sufficient to use an older version > of swig? (mostly, I want to make sure that I can continue development > on FC5 for the next 6-8 months).
I think so. I think the newer swig was just needed to generate the runtime. I was going to ask you to exercise the business module anyway, once I addressed some bugs that are obvious, so you can always try 1.3.24 and see if it works. :) -chris _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
