On May 20, 2006, at 1:56 PM, don Paolo Benvenuto wrote:
El mar, 16-05-2006 a las 11:11 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG escribió:
Since 1.9.6 is the first official beta, I have uploaded it to the
Debian unstable distribution. (Previous 1.9 releases were only in
Debian experimental.)
A question: does it make sense to rename the old gnucash executable to
gnucash1 and install the unstable package? That would permit to keep
using the gnome1 gnucash and testing the gnome2 one.
Would gnucash1 keep working?
The generic answer is the two versions of gnucash can't be in the
same $PREFIX, and there might be problems if either version is in the
default location. Debian may be different, however. YMMV.
--
Buon Cammino!
don Paolo Benvenuto
--
David Reiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
