Derek Atkins schrieb:
I'd propose:
> (...)
I admit this would be a LOT easier if QOF were based on gobject and we used g_signal... Mea Culpa. What do you think?
Actually that was what I was thinking. *Iff* the API should be changed anyway, and as QOF depends on glib deeply anyway, what are the reasons for not making the transition of QOF to be based on gobject and g_signal?
Christian _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
