Neil Williams wrote:
Personally, as a gnucash user in the UK, I'd much rather *not* have zero
padding on data entry or data display of UK date formats.
There is no UK consensus on whether 04/02/06 is preferable to 4/2/6 or 4/2/06.
It's a "problem" of the 21st century where single digit years can cause
confusion. In my business life, all three of the above are perfectly
acceptable, whether on casual notes or official documents.
I agree with Neil, also as a UK gnucash user, that I would prefer not to
have zero padding, except possibly in the year part of the date, which
would normally be padded to two digits (at present).
I feel we should look at this as a possible config option and bounce the idea
around on gnucash-user before assuming that zero padding is the "Right Thing
To Do".
Agreed.
Nigel
_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
