On Mon, 2006-01-16 at 16:21 -0500, Derek Atkins wrote: > I gave up that fight a couple years ago. Getting people to make sure > "make check" worked was an uphill battle. Worse, there are a number > of tests that use random input and, as a result, randomly fail. Some > people wanted to fix this by making the test non-random.. But I think > that only masks the actual bug that certain inputs triggered.
Then we should remove broken tests, so we know if something was broken un-intentionally. > > No objection. How well-maintainted is the bugzilla? Are there some > > bugzilla-masters out there? > > Define "well maintained". It's run by the gnome project, so it's fairly > stable. All the committers should have full access to the GnuCash bugs. > If you do not then you should let us know what your bugzilla ID is so > you can get access. I added him earlier, actually. :) -- ...jsled http://asynchronous.org/ - `a=jsled; b=asynchronous.org; echo [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
