On Friday 25 February 2005 5:08 am, Chris Lyttle wrote: > Neil, > > I've not attempted to validate the xml in the docs for use to convert to > pdf, just that its valid for conversion to html which the build script > does. Its possible to do this, but I'd rather not add the MB of pdf to > the docs build
That's fine, we can leave it to the user to create the PDF - most people don't need it but it would make it easier to keep the PDF updated. It doesn't need to be a build target, just a note in the README and then syntax corrections. If there are any other requirements, I'll let you know. > and I haven't really had a lot of time to do more than > release new docs whenever someone updates them. Basically, anyone who > wants to submit patches to have the docs easily convert to pdf using > docbook2pdf is welcome. OK. I'll check the error reports and commit any necessary syntax changes. > I'm not sure I understand your comment about > using docbook-xsl as this is from what I understand the standard toolset > for use with docbook. docbook2pdf and the other docbook-utils tools use Perl and bash to create a jade command that then uses the xsl. i.e. when using docbook-utils, all the xsl stuff is hidden away. It's a convenience wrapper. -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.dcglug.org.uk/ http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/ http://sourceforge.net/projects/isbnsearch/ http://www.neil.williamsleesmill.me.uk/ http://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0x8801094A28BCB3E3
pgpw1sgmnEtVS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel