-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, June 23, 2004 10:34 am, Englisch, Volker (NIH/NCI) said: >> >>> >> > Would you prefer we start with oldest or newest unconfirmed bugs. >> Maybe >> > each of us should start from different end. >> >> I don't have a preference. Just being able to close out bugs that >> are no longer a factor, or bugs that cannot be reproduced... and pushing >> back bugs that don't have enough information.. and being able >> to reproduce bugs... That would help significantly. >> >> If I can go to a bug and easily reproduce it, I can (generally) easily >> fix it. Sometimes the reproduction part is the most challenging >> aspect! >> >>-derek > > I was thinking to look at the oldest bugs first hoping that most of those > could be closed out because they can not be reproduced in the newer > versions. > Maybe the easiest for now would be to one of us start from the top while > the > other starts at the bottom or one takes the bugs with even bug numbers > while > the other one looks at the odd ones. I'm OK with any approach. >
Ok, Why dont you start with oldest, I'll start with newest. I am having some difficulty with the machine I was going to use as my sandbox, but I should be able to start shortly (within a week or so). > Here is a question that came up yesterday when I looked at a (randomly > selected) bug (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143992). > One could argue that the reported bug is a feature which doesn't need to > be > addressed. How should bugs like this be handled? Should we merely state > that the behavior has been confirmed and leave it up to the developer to > decide what should be done? > > -- Volker > It prob wouldnt hurt to confirm it, and pass it on. Let Linas and Derek decide on inclusion/priority. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA2ZYiNRXw2JLE9hURAkzSAJ9+EqdIl/W/Pum4iPCHrQ70FTQHQwCePNUp 36VzfB6uP9ahHcY/q6BRv2w= =1VMt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
