On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 08:32:58PM -0700, Alan Orndorff wrote:
>
> > Which means I won't be running it. I was disappointed when I read an
> > article about this and saw gnucash dissed. I know gnucash isn't as
> > polished as quicken (yet), but it hasn't been in development for 10+
> > years, either. And since nobody has even seen kapital, we really don't
> > know where it stands either.
>
> Not sure that I would agree that I wouldn't run it just because someone
> dissed gnucash in an article. Looking over the site and the screenshots
> looks like a pretty nice prodcut if they are more than just screenshots.
You misunderstood me. I won't be running it because it is proprietary,
not because they dissed gnucash. It was a reporter that dissed
gnucash anyway, not the kapital folks.
--
Dr. David C. Merrill http://www.lupercalia.net
Linux Documentation Project [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Collection Editor & Coordinator http://www.linuxdoc.org
Finger me for my public key
Democracy is the worst form of government except all those other
forms that have been tried from time to time.
-- Winston Churchill
_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gnumatic.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
