On Tue Jan 16, 2001 at 05:51:31PM +1100, Robert Graham Merkel wrote:
> Ariel Rios writes:
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 14 Jan 2001, Dan Kegel wrote:
> >
> > > I'm sure this has been discussed a zillion times but I'd like to bring it up
>again:
> > >
> > > Requiring that all high-level Gnucash code be in Scheme might be
> > > restricting the number of developers able to contribute to it.
> > Why?
> > > Here's a few quotes from the web in support of that theory
> > > (found by searching for "scheme learning curve"):
> > I don't see why quoting some web posts can be a good reason.
>
> OK, here's the canonical reply to "why do we use scheme".
<snip>
Ok, GNUCash uses Scheme as their scripting language; now what if I
wanted to contribute C-code? Would it be rejected?
--Dirk-Jan.
_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gnumatic.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
