[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

> Hmmm ... maybe its a job for (drum roll) !**! scheme!
> 
> we've already got g-wrap to convert our C structs & api to scheme:
> it allows the scheme code to push & poke values into the C structs.
> 
> Now, if someone were to write a scheme-to-soap thingy, we'd be set.
> (The perl-to-soap thingy took 'one programer two weeks' according to 
> the faq.)

Well, getting g-wrap to spit out something other than libguile C code
wouldn't be all that hard.  I pushed most of the way to that level of
abstraction with the last rewrite.  There'd be a few more things to be
done, but as I think about it, maybe not that much.

> I'm hitting Rob on his weak spot.  Just say 'this will benefit the scheme
> language' and he gets all excited ... 

:>

-- 
Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP=E80E0D04F521A094 532B97F5D64E3930

_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gnumatic.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel

Reply via email to