"Phillip Shelton" writes:
> Depends on how you use groupings. Are we going to allow someone to have an
> account that is part of credit and part of clothes, part of sport, part of
> hobbies ...
>
> There was a question some time ago about being able to get away from having
> a tree of accounts and moving to a connected graph. This was to allow for
> different types of reports.
>
> The example was safety clothes for a sport. Was it a clothes expense or a
> sport expense and why could it not be both.
Currently, an account can belong to only one group. We've
considered the possibility of having more than one hierarchy,
so that the same account could be in more than on hierarchy,
but those hierarchies would still be trees, I think.
dave
_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gnumatic.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
