Derek Atkins wrote: > David Merrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > aisb, I consider the issue of closing the books and making all > > transactions prior to that immutable to be completely orthogonal to how > > the running total is determined. I am proposing a solution to the > > maintenance of running balances that scales well. I agree. > Let me give an example... You have 1000 transactions a day, so you do > daily checkpoints. And going back to the table, if you do daily checkpoints then you get one record per day. Is date good enough to allow you to do a checkpoint every 500 transactions? In this case you would have two records per day. i.e. does date include the time? _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gnumatic.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
- Re: File store (was Re: Salutations) Derek Atkins
- Re: File store (was Re: Salutations) Al Snell
- RE: File store (was Re: Salutations) Phillip Shelton
- Re: File store (was Re: Salutations) David Merrill
- Re: File store (was Re: Salutations) Derek Atkins
- Re: File store (was Re: Salutations) David Merrill
- Re: File store (was Re: Salutations) Derek Atkins
- Re: File store (was Re: Salutations) David Merrill
- Re: File store (was Re: Salutations) Phillip J Shelton
- Re: File store (was Re: Salutations) David Merrill
- Re: File store (was Re: Salutations) Phillip J Shelton
- Re: File store (was Re: Salutations) David Merrill
- Balance Checkpoints Christopher Browne
- Re: Balance Checkpoints David Merrill
- RE: Balance Checkpoints Phillip Shelton
- Re: File store (was Re: Salutations) Christopher Browne
- RE: File store (was Re: Salutations) Phillip Shelton
- Re: File store (was Re: Salutations) Steve Greenland
- Re: File store (was Re: Salutations) David Merrill
- Re: File store (was Re: Salutations) Al Snell
- RE: File store (was Re: Salutations) Phillip Shelton