Rob Browning writes:
> Robert Graham Merkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Dave, do you recall what conclusion we came to, if any when we were
> musing about the possibility of (internally) killing off the account
> heirarchy altogether? ISTR we talked about the possibility of just
> having one large flat account list, and then representing heirarchical
> organizations of these accounts as trees containing pointers into the
> global list. In this setup we could relax the type relationships --
> and even show multiple different organizations of the accounts.
I don't think we came to a specific conclusion there.
dave
_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gnumatic.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
