Christopher Browne writes: > We thus have _three_ times: > a) The moment at which you incurred the transaction, > b) The moment at which the effects of the transaction hit your bank account, > and > c) The moment at which you typed in the transaction. > All three being legitimately different. > I would think c) to be the least meaningful of the three. I would think that c) is the most meaningful of the three. It is likely to be the most accurate available record of the date on which you recognized the transaction, and it is the date and time that, when used to sort the transactions, is likely to be least surprising to the user. It is also the only one of three that is always available. -- John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dancing Horse Hill Elmwood, Wisconsin -- Gnucash Developer's List To unsubscribe send empty email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Order of transactions Dave Peticolas
- Re: Order of transactions Rob Walker
- Re: Order of transactions Christopher Browne
- Re: Order of transactions Richard Wackerbarth
- Re: Order of transactions Derek Atkins
- Re: Order of transactions Gerald Champagne
- Re: Order of transactions Dave Peticolas
- Re: Order of transactions Christopher Browne
- Re: Order of transactions Dave Peticolas
- Re: Order of transactions Richard Wackerbarth
- Re: Order of transactions John Hasler
- Re: Order of transactions Richard Wackerbarth
- Re: Order of transactions Rob Walker
- Re: Order of transactions Dave Peticolas
- Re: Order of transactions Richard Wackerbarth
- Re: Order of transactions Randolph Fritz
- Re: Order of transactions John Hasler
- Re: Order of transactions Randolph Fritz
- Re: Order of transactions John Hasler
- Re: Order of transactions John Hasler
- Re: Order of transactions Christopher Browne