Dave Peticolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Do you mean the SICP style object stuff? If so, then I'm just fine
> > with that - it's a really nice model. I think my only remaining
> > concern with that approach was performance, and if that's not an
> > issue, then it's not an issue :>
>
> I think the performance issue should be kept in mind, but considering
> the relative infrequency that these report structures will be accessed,
> I don't think it will be an issue in this case.
What I really meant by that was that I really think that doing the
more elegant/maintainable/extensible thing should always be preferred,
*unless* performance is an issue, and I agree there here there's no
reason to suspect it would be.
--
Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP=E80E0D04F521A094 532B97F5D64E3930
--
Gnucash Developer's List
To unsubscribe send empty email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
