>>>>> Rob Browning writes:
Rob> Jeremy Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Nana
Rob> Linas has indicated that this didn't live up to his expectations, and
Rob> I'm not really hooked on it either, so at some point we might want to
Rob> revisit whether or not we want to keep it...
If I am not mistaken Nana is sort of a replacement for assert.h (I
might be oversimplifying but that is what I gathered from reading the
GNU web). This might be useful to keep in or learn more about. I
don't know much about Nana yet though i will be soon enough.
>> Swig
>> eperl/perl
Rob> These should go away as a hard requirement soon. It should only be
Rob> needed when something like --with-perl-module is specified. This
Rob> depends on someone doing the autoconf work, and on me finishing up the
Rob> new reports stuff.
What needs to be done for Autoconf ? I have some experience with it
and might be able to help. What do we want to do ? Remove the
perl/eperl dependencies entirely ?
mehul
--
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
- Indira Gandhi
stolen from Ben Laurie on the FSB list.
--
Gnucash Developer's List
To unsubscribe send empty email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
