On Thu, 2006-12-07 at 11:09 +0100, Luca Ferretti wrote: > I'm working on http://bugs.gnome.org/348350 : switch custom Epiphany > icons to Tango style and to named icons. I've a doubt about names for > named icons. > > Currently Epiphany is using "epiphany-download", "epiphany-history", > "epiphany-popup-hidden" and so on. > > Because I'm following the Rodney suggestion to install those icons in > ${prefix}/share/<appname>/icons/hicolor/<size>/<role>, I suspect we > don't need the epiphany- prefix anymore. So I think we could install > them as > > Name Role Notes > download actions used in menu and for download window
This needs to be reviewed. Download and Save are essentially the same action. Download just becomes "Save a Copy". I don't see any reason to have a separate "download" icon. > popup-hidden status I suppose this is ok. I wish epiphany would actually hide all of the pop-ups though, unless explicitly opened via my clicking. > history apps > bookmarks apps Neither of these are apps. They are abstract concepts explicit to the browser internals. I don't see why there should be separate entries for them in the system programs menu. I don't think they really need icons either. > entry (???) to add entry widget to toolbar I think this needs to be resolved through the HIG. We have some apps that have editable toolbars, some that don't, some that let you drag the bars around, and all that. Clearly there needs to be some work done on cleaning this up and making things more strictly consistent. I don't think "entry" is a good name either. It's not a generic entry widget. It's called the "location entry" or "location bar" in most apps. But again, I don't think it's something that needs an icon. -- dobey _______________________________________________ gnome-themes-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-themes-list
