Il giorno ven, 21/10/2005 alle 22.19 +0100, Thomas Wood ha scritto: > On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 19:52 +0300, Tuomas Kuosmanen wrote: > > On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 17:03 +0100, Calum Benson wrote: > > > Vaguely related, I'd personally like the onus of providing high contrast > > > icons to move to the applications. They're probably the only themes > > > where every possible icon on the desktop really needs to be catered for, > > > and it's ridiculous to try and do that centrally. Applications are > > > allowed to install icons into the hicolor theme; if we're really taking > > > accessibility seriously, I believe the high contrast themes should have > > > a similar status to hicolor. > > > > Yeah. If an application calls itself "accessible", having high contrast > > icons could be one of the requirements. Distributing the icons in the > > apps themselves sounds like a way to avoid lagging the high contrast > > theme behind the desktop. > > Agreed. If we want to take action on this though, we'll need to disperse > the icon theme out to all the individual projects and incorporate them > into their build and install procedures. We would also have to make sure > all new projects include a high contrast icon. The difficult part would > be keeping tabs on existing projects to make sure they are always > installing a high contrast version of their icons. Maybe it would be > possible to build a script to check the current release modules and make > sure they include a high contrast icon?
Should we provide some autotools macros (a-la gnome-doc-utils) to make it easy for developers? _______________________________________________ gnome-themes-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-themes-list
