On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 11:07 PM tjoen <tj...@dds.nl> wrote:

> > > > Command
> > > > '[u'/home/tdance/rpmbuild/BUILD/gnome-shell-3.26.0/_build/tmp-
> > > > introspectJOKYck/Shell-0.1',
> > > > u'--introspect-dump=/home/tdance/rpmbuild/BUILD/gnome-shell-
> > > > 3.26.0/_build/tmp-
> > > > introspectJOKYck/functions.txt,/home/tdance/rpmbuild/BUILD/gnome-
> > > > shell-3.26.0/_build/tmp-introspectJOKYck/dump.xml']'
> > > > returned non-zero exit status -11
> > > > ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.
> > > >
> > > > Similar problem with gjs-1.50.0 : Command
>
> My guess is that mozjs-52 is the culprit. My reasoning is
> that only two tarballs show this problem: gjs and gnome-shell.
> And those two programs are the only ones linked to mozjs.
>
> My mozjs is the official one from firefox-52.3.0esr
> I guess most distros have their own patched ones.
> So my question now:
> Which one is officially approved by the gnome-developpers?
>

This one:
https://download.gnome.org/teams/releng/tarballs-needing-help/mozjs/

If you want to build from a git repository, use this:
https://github.com/ptomato/mozjs

There is no official mozjs 52 release yet from Mozilla. The one included in
the Firefox source code has, as you have noticed, some problems when used
as a stand alone library.

If in doubt, always use the source indicated in jhbuild.

Regards,
Philip C
_______________________________________________
gnome-shell-list mailing list
gnome-shell-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list

Reply via email to