Hi:
> The extension review process is mostly for checking whether the
> extension is malicious or not ... reviewers are free to check other
> things like code quality, obvious bugs etc. but that depends on the
> reviewer.
Yes, but with a stable API for the most common things, changes in the
internal structure of GS won't mean the need to modify extensions each
six months. And if the code doesn't change so often, then the code
reviews will be much less and the whole process be more fluid.
When my extensions worked directly, without changes, in a new GS
version, I just uploaded them with the same code but a new metadata.json
with the new list of valid versions, and they appeared automatically,
because a code review wasn't needed.
--
Nos leemos
RASTER (Linux user #228804)
ras...@rastersoft.com http://www.rastersoft.com
_______________________________________________
gnome-shell-list mailing list
gnome-shell-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
