>
> Of course, it would be wonderful or terrible if we have global menus,
> but we don't. We have "Application Menus"... what's the difference?


I just tried shell 3.3.5 on Fedora 17 alpha, and I noticed the application
menu on Gnome Docs. This is a bit confusing
because it isn't like global gnome app menu, but is quite specific to Gnome
Docs. Gnome Docs hasn't any kind of
menu but global menu.
So every time the user should check global menus for extra functionality on
any App, or he might miss extra functionality
because he won't check global menus.

I think that Shell UI is very intelligent and smart, but this feature seems
like a step backward. I personally like hidden menus,
like Firefox. One button, BOOM, mega menu.

Application menu, is good for options like "create new, close, move to
another workspace, etc" but not for display grid or list
view on Gnome Docs. That option I think it should belong to GTK App Menu.

On the other hand, you do great job and I trust every single change you
made!
Keep up good work,
Cheers..

On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Adam Tauno Williams <awill...@whitemice.org
> wrote:

> On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 17:38 +0000, Gabriel Rossetti wrote:
>
> > I just read this
> > (http://afaikblog.wordpress.com/2012/02/28/looking-forward-to-gnome-3-4/)
> article on Gnome 3.4. It looks like since it’s forcing the new global menus
> breaks the sloppy mouse focus, how are you going to fix this (are you? I
> hope so...)?
>
> Well, it says "Application menus have now arrived, so that GNOME
> applications can place a menu in the top bar. "
>
> I don't know that this necessarily implies a Mac like menu system [I
> certainly hope not, that would certainly drive me from GNOME;  and I'm a
> huge fan of GNOME3].  It just says applications *can* place menu in the
> top bar.  I think there are cases where this is appropriate.  It would
> certainly be better than the lousy status icon in the constantly
> vanishing, hovering, vanishing bottom notification bar that apps like
> banshee currently use.  [Note: not a critcism of Banshee, Banshee ROCKS!
> ]
>
> > What I don’t quite understand, is that one thing a lot of people hate
> > about unity is the global menus, I even read an article saying that in
> > future versions of Mac OS X it’s possible that it will disappear
>
> I know nothing about Mac OS/X.  And I don't find what they choose to
> do/not-do to be particularly relevant or interesting.
>
> >  (sorry, no longer have the link), so why is Gnome Shell switching to
> > it? If it was optional then I’d understand, some people may like that,
> > but others don’t.
> >
>
>
> --
> System & Network Administrator [ LPI & NCLA ]
> <http://www.whitemiceconsulting.com>
> OpenGroupware Developer <http://www.opengroupware.us>
> Adam Tauno Williams
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-shell-list mailing list
> gnome-shell-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
>
_______________________________________________
gnome-shell-list mailing list
gnome-shell-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list

Reply via email to