Well that sounds really good. Thank you. Thank you all for the quick responses. I will do that. And I plan on contacting the developer to see if I can have him update the extensions page so it can be easier for other newbies.
Thanks again. On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Reda Lazri <[email protected]>wrote: > I just went to the page the author put in that link you gave, installed > both extensions they worked fine. > > Download the tar.gz files you find useful, extract them to > ~/.local/share/gnome-shell/extensions and restart the shell. > > But do this at your own risk. > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 8:29 PM, Jasper St. Pierre > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 2:06 PM, My Name Is <[email protected]> wrote: >> > I've been running Fedora 16 for about two months and I have been really >> > happy with it, once the extensions for Gnome 3 came out. >> > >> > I was shocked and dismayed when I was setting up a new (Fedora 16) >> system >> > for a friend and the error I got from the extension page was that the >> auto >> > hide top panel was not compatible with my version of Gnome 3. And if >> you go >> > to the general extensions site, you can't find it anymore. >> > >> > >> https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/42/auto-hide-top-panel/version/99/ >> > >> > What. The. Hell? >> > >> > And not only that, the noa11y was not available either. These are my two >> > most favorite extensions. In fact, I dare say that if they were >> eliminated >> > from Gnome 3, I would change to a different Windows manager because I >> find >> > the very pleasing. >> > >> > So my question is: >> > >> > What happened to the auto-hide-top-panel and noa11y? >> >> We give extension authors the ability to mark certain extension >> versions as inactive or obsolete. auto-hide-top-panel is marked as >> inactive [0]. Ask the extension author why. >> >> If by "noa11y" you mean "Remove Accesibility" [1], then it should be >> fixed now. It was marked as compatible only with GNOME Shell 3.2.1, >> but there was another version in the queue that bumped the >> compatibility to 3.2, which I just approved. >> >> > Shouldn't there be some log, some site that says "hey, we removed it >> because >> > ......" >> > _______________________________________________ >> > gnome-shell-list mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list >> > >> >> [0] http://i.imgur.com/TTvaB.png >> [1] https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/112/remove-accesibility/ >> >> -- >> Jasper >> _______________________________________________ >> gnome-shell-list mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list >> > > > > -- > *deviantART*: http://0rAX0.deviantart.com > *Google+*: > http://gplus.to/RedaLazri<https://plus.google.com/101681698460010159459> > >
_______________________________________________ gnome-shell-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
