I totally agree with you.
Yes: G3 sets a new paradigm in User Experience, AND that's one of the
great things about it. Of course it needs work, otherwise, as Jasper
implied earlier, it would be perfect, and not being perfect (I've known
little or no perfect thing in my lifetime) is fun for developers. Still,
I think users with less reticence to change will find G3 as a great work
on progress, perfectly usable for daily work. Those who find it annoying
should simply switch to a different Desktop Environment (G2 or else).

Best regards,
-- 

                                                         Sw.E. D.H. Bahr
                                         Nova Desktop Development Leader
                                      CESOL (Free/Libre Software Centre)
                                UCI (University of Informatics Sciences)
                                                            Havana, Cuba




El Thu, 01-09-2011 a las 14:12 +0100, Steve Sheldon escribió: 

> Hiya,
>  
> On G2 I almost always used 2 or 3 virtual desktops to keep tabs of
> everything, but with G3 I found that having more than 1 virtual
> desktop is difficult to keep tabs on if you'll excuse the pun..
> instead it seems easier to use the alt tab for task switching, and the
> windows key to get to the application overview screen. The only
> frustration is that I cannot tell what I have running, other than what
> is onscreen, unless I go to the overview screen which means I am
> having to remember what I have running. In all other respects I am
> very happy with G3 now I have had time to really try it out.. the
> application search if using the windows key and first few char of app
> name is faster than the mouse based menu system G2 has, and G3 does
> seem to be at least as stable as G2 so yes, it *is* a work in progress
> but perfectly workable, with justy a few features missing, and far far
> more polished than the Unity interface.
>  
> Regards
> Steve Sheldon
> 
> >>> Adam Tauno Williams <awill...@whitemice.org> 01/09/2011 13:52:15
> >>>
> On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 17:25 -0400, Jesse Hutton wrote:
> 
> > I thought this would naturally be the case, as well. However, I've
> > recently read in #gnome-design two different *lead* designers claim
> to
> > not use workspaces. Both instances were in the context of discussing
> > issues people found, so maybe it these were off-hand comments as a
> > basis to claim ignorance. Nonetheless, apparently you *don't* need
> to
> > use workspaces to enjoy Gnome Shell.
> 
> Certainly, and I don't see why Shell would be hard to use in a single
> workspace.  When I'm out and about I typically use G3 in a single
> workspace,  the improved window switching and activity overview makes
> many-windows-in-a-workspace much easier to use than under G2
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-shell-list mailing list
> gnome-shell-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
> 
> 
> 
> The information contained in this e-mail is privileged and
> confidential and
> is intended only for the use of the addressee. Unauthorised
> disclosure,
> copying or distribution of the contents is strictly prohibited.
> Please reply immediately if you receive this e-mail in error and then
> immediately delete it from your system.
> Photo-Me International does not authorise the creation of contracts on
> its
> behalf by e-mail.
> All attachments have been scanned for viruses using regularly updated
> programs. Photo-Me International cannot accept liability for any
> damage you
> incur as a result of virus infection. 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-shell-list mailing list
> gnome-shell-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
_______________________________________________
gnome-shell-list mailing list
gnome-shell-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list

Reply via email to