On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 8:22 PM, Tim Cuthbertson <t...@gfxmonk.net> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 4:53 AM, John Stowers > <john.stowers.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I announced it here when I released the first version, but nobody >>> replied so I don't really know how other efforts are faring or how >>> much interest there still is. >> >> I tried and liked it, but could not really be bothered to deal with the >> required mutter fork longterm. > > Mmm, fair enough. I had hoped that using 0install would make that > easy, but it seems that my compiled version either doesn't work for > some or that people aren't keen on using 0install. Or you may have > other patches to mutter you want to maintain yourself. I believe > someone's keeping an arch package up to date for shellshape-mutter, > which is nice of them. > >> I saw in BZ you are trying to get some of the needed bits upstream. How >> is that going? > > Somewhat glacially, I'm afraid. I guess they're not high priority > compared to fixes and 3.2 features, but it's a bit disheartening. I've > got one simple patch in so far: > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=653858 > > But am still waiting on two more that I've submitted patches for: > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=651899 > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=655615
... you didn't attach a patch to this bug? > ..and the big one, which I have no idea how to fix - keyboard > shortcuts. This seems like the biggest issue of all, that would > probably need a decent restructure to accomodate. On the plus side, > this is not a unique bug for me - it should affect *anyone* who wants > to add new keybindings after compile-time. But I don't know that > there's much enthusiasm for allowing that, having received no comments > after two months: > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=651901 Florian is working on a keybinding rewrite as part of his port to gsettings. I don't know how far along that is, or where it is, even. > I could submit a patch that instead adds all the keybindings I want, > but I presume that has zero chance of being accepted (they're > completely meaningless to the rest of mutter). > > Cheers, > - Tim. > _______________________________________________ > gnome-shell-list mailing list > gnome-shell-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list > -- Jasper _______________________________________________ gnome-shell-list mailing list gnome-shell-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
