*even without reading the design articles, i really think that there are
things in gnome shell that should go away, like the minimize and
maximize controls and even the close control because of the whole
design. yes, even if our words here will not go through the design
team, it is still a good thing to talk, as it will relieve the stress of
testing gnome shell lately.
hiding things that were really needed much by folks outside i believe is
not really helpful. a minor design issue can be a show stopper to some
people. most people here are windows users, and i just want them to use
linux and gnome with ubuntu* as what i am doing for some workstations.
ubuntu may provide the shell package in the future, and we have to
decide of which 'interface' we will be using = unity or the official
gnome shell, the choice is not according to my feelings, but according
to the user feedback. i have high hopes for gnome shell, and i hope for
the major release they will fix the icons in the dash because that will
be a big issue for me, not necessarily the shutdown/restart hiding since
that can be easily hacked.
* i can't uppercase, one of my vmware guest suddenly closed by itself.
* we will be using lts 12.04
On Friday, 11 March, 2011 12:02 PM, Justin Edwards wrote:
Hiding things like this will make people think twice about giving
gnome-shell a try. If you can't perform simple tasks using obvious
methods, then the UI is not doing it's job. I like gnome-shell, but
I know how people are.
It might not do any good saying anything at this point, but it's such
a simple thing.
Justin Edwards
Telelanguage Inc
For support, please call 1.888.983.5352 and press 3
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 8:38 PM, Allan E. Registos
<allan.regis...@smpc.steniel.com.ph
<mailto:allan.regis...@smpc.steniel.com.ph>> wrote:
On Thursday, 10 March, 2011 01:36 PM, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
The thing is, UI freeze has already passed. We can't really
make any changes to the UI at this time. So while we can talk
about it we can't make any change prior to release.
Yes, as I am aware of it. Wanna prove a point further. :)
The change isn't too bad I think. If we document that we need
to do "press alt" as part of the change then that might work.
It may or might not work for end users(these beings will never
read manuals until being forced to do so). Documentation will
always work for IT people of all sorts because that is part of
what we do.
Also, distros might decide that they need to add the shutdown
option and might do that on their own.
Yes, its a good thing, being this is a minor design issue, the
design team could go on hiding those buttons.
But I don't think continuing to talk about it here is going
to contribute to any significant changes prior to release
given our deadlines.
sri
--
There must be a computer language that is 100% visual, but runs at
the speed of the C language.
_______________________________________________
gnome-shell-list mailing list
gnome-shell-list@gnome.org <mailto:gnome-shell-list@gnome.org>
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
--
There must be a computer language that is 100% visual, but runs at the speed of
the C language.
_______________________________________________
gnome-shell-list mailing list
gnome-shell-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
