1) Which features of the gnome shell do you consider more ergonomic > 2) How do you find the gnome shell more productive than then classic Gnome > DE? > than the classic gnome? > I would answer both at the same time since ergonmy is the key to productivity.
The list can be long : - The tiled view is awesome. I like it better than the expo plugin of compiz since the desktop are seen bigger. - The launchers which point to the app if it's already started. No use for an applist bar. Docks have been doing this for a while. - The depth of menus is shorter - mouse gestures are easier & faster than clicks. Most actions are performed with one click and only one. in general, my feeling is that gnome-shell does at least as good as gnome+compiz+cairo-dock with way less config hacks than before. I'm using gnome-shell at work, while previously I was using gnome+compiz+cairo-dock. I have to manage ~20 computers, and tweaking compiz to get from eye-candy to real useful was some work. Now i get useful functions out of the box. 3) How is gnome shell easier to use than KDE? I don't know if it's easier to use, I just like gnome look better. I agree it can be quite disturbing at the beginning, but after a few hours, it's an experience I wouldn't want to abandon easily.
_______________________________________________ gnome-shell-list mailing list gnome-shell-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
